All posts

Hire for diversity, not performance

Author
Dave Winsborough
Created on
May 5, 2025

You've built a team of exceptional workers, who do a great job of delivering their outputs. You have nurtured this group carefully over a couple of years, using talent assessments to match employee profiles to that of high performers. Given this, the group is a lot the same — kind of quirky, introverted, naive, a bit obsessive and they love routine, but work quality is high and productivity good.

And then a pandemic hits.  

Suddenly this group’s routines, important rituals and processes are completely disrupted. Now they all want your attention individually, and they seem lost and unable to cope with the back-to-back Zoom calls, working from home and changed systems. Never mind quality, getting anything done seems impossible.

Organizational change drastically confounds the traditional ways we go about hiring and developing employee talent. Traditional ways of using talent assessments for hiring are overtly biased: they filter out some people because their characteristics don't fit a pre-defined high performer profile, and select people who are all similar. 

Psychologists have pushed this technique because it works well. But only if the job requirements remain constant and the world doesn't change. The need for diversity and variability in talent that can respond to change is often overlooked, and in its place, predictability and conformity are (well-intentionally) sought after. 

If it wasn’t already obvious, 2020 showed us that our teams and organizations need to have flexible, diverse and adaptive talent as all industries are not magically insulated from real world events.

Rather than cultivating employee talent that is tightly mapped against a “cookie-cutter” set of high-performance competencies, smart firms and leaders seek greater variability in their hires  — even if that costs a little bit of performance. Resilience, creativity, and adaptability beat high performing clones every single time there is a change or a disruption to 'normal'.

Human history is replete with examples of teams that went on to succeed and achieve ambitious goals, not because they all conformed to traditional notions of talent (i.e. experience, technical expertise and intelligence), but because they had a diverse set of complementary characteristics and understood how to work together, or what we call Cognitive Diversity.

 If you are looking to hire talent into your team, we ask you to consider the performance-diversity trade-off:

  • If you hire for traditional notions of performance, you will have a team that is well-positioned to work and execute goals in a specific and consistent way but struggle with agility and flexibility.
  • If you hire for diversity and plan to complement and close existing talent gaps, you’ll have a team that is adaptive, inclusive, creative and able to overcome any problem that comes its way. 

At Deeper Signals, we are pioneering new approaches that enable smart firms and managers to square the circle: identify the qualities of high performance and talent, but also warn of conformity and not enough cognitive diversity in the talent pool. These insights help leaders build teams that are fit for purpose and future ready.

Leadership is always about tradeoffs. Time to trade-in old approaches for new. 

All posts

Hire for diversity, not performance

Author
Dave Winsborough
Created on

You've built a team of exceptional workers, who do a great job of delivering their outputs. You have nurtured this group carefully over a couple of years, using talent assessments to match employee profiles to that of high performers. Given this, the group is a lot the same — kind of quirky, introverted, naive, a bit obsessive and they love routine, but work quality is high and productivity good.

And then a pandemic hits.  

Suddenly this group’s routines, important rituals and processes are completely disrupted. Now they all want your attention individually, and they seem lost and unable to cope with the back-to-back Zoom calls, working from home and changed systems. Never mind quality, getting anything done seems impossible.

Organizational change drastically confounds the traditional ways we go about hiring and developing employee talent. Traditional ways of using talent assessments for hiring are overtly biased: they filter out some people because their characteristics don't fit a pre-defined high performer profile, and select people who are all similar. 

Psychologists have pushed this technique because it works well. But only if the job requirements remain constant and the world doesn't change. The need for diversity and variability in talent that can respond to change is often overlooked, and in its place, predictability and conformity are (well-intentionally) sought after. 

If it wasn’t already obvious, 2020 showed us that our teams and organizations need to have flexible, diverse and adaptive talent as all industries are not magically insulated from real world events.

Rather than cultivating employee talent that is tightly mapped against a “cookie-cutter” set of high-performance competencies, smart firms and leaders seek greater variability in their hires  — even if that costs a little bit of performance. Resilience, creativity, and adaptability beat high performing clones every single time there is a change or a disruption to 'normal'.

Human history is replete with examples of teams that went on to succeed and achieve ambitious goals, not because they all conformed to traditional notions of talent (i.e. experience, technical expertise and intelligence), but because they had a diverse set of complementary characteristics and understood how to work together, or what we call Cognitive Diversity.

 If you are looking to hire talent into your team, we ask you to consider the performance-diversity trade-off:

  • If you hire for traditional notions of performance, you will have a team that is well-positioned to work and execute goals in a specific and consistent way but struggle with agility and flexibility.
  • If you hire for diversity and plan to complement and close existing talent gaps, you’ll have a team that is adaptive, inclusive, creative and able to overcome any problem that comes its way. 

At Deeper Signals, we are pioneering new approaches that enable smart firms and managers to square the circle: identify the qualities of high performance and talent, but also warn of conformity and not enough cognitive diversity in the talent pool. These insights help leaders build teams that are fit for purpose and future ready.

Leadership is always about tradeoffs. Time to trade-in old approaches for new. 

All posts

Hire for diversity, not performance

Author
Dave Winsborough
Created on
May 5, 2025

You've built a team of exceptional workers, who do a great job of delivering their outputs. You have nurtured this group carefully over a couple of years, using talent assessments to match employee profiles to that of high performers. Given this, the group is a lot the same — kind of quirky, introverted, naive, a bit obsessive and they love routine, but work quality is high and productivity good.

And then a pandemic hits.  

Suddenly this group’s routines, important rituals and processes are completely disrupted. Now they all want your attention individually, and they seem lost and unable to cope with the back-to-back Zoom calls, working from home and changed systems. Never mind quality, getting anything done seems impossible.

Organizational change drastically confounds the traditional ways we go about hiring and developing employee talent. Traditional ways of using talent assessments for hiring are overtly biased: they filter out some people because their characteristics don't fit a pre-defined high performer profile, and select people who are all similar. 

Psychologists have pushed this technique because it works well. But only if the job requirements remain constant and the world doesn't change. The need for diversity and variability in talent that can respond to change is often overlooked, and in its place, predictability and conformity are (well-intentionally) sought after. 

If it wasn’t already obvious, 2020 showed us that our teams and organizations need to have flexible, diverse and adaptive talent as all industries are not magically insulated from real world events.

Rather than cultivating employee talent that is tightly mapped against a “cookie-cutter” set of high-performance competencies, smart firms and leaders seek greater variability in their hires  — even if that costs a little bit of performance. Resilience, creativity, and adaptability beat high performing clones every single time there is a change or a disruption to 'normal'.

Human history is replete with examples of teams that went on to succeed and achieve ambitious goals, not because they all conformed to traditional notions of talent (i.e. experience, technical expertise and intelligence), but because they had a diverse set of complementary characteristics and understood how to work together, or what we call Cognitive Diversity.

 If you are looking to hire talent into your team, we ask you to consider the performance-diversity trade-off:

  • If you hire for traditional notions of performance, you will have a team that is well-positioned to work and execute goals in a specific and consistent way but struggle with agility and flexibility.
  • If you hire for diversity and plan to complement and close existing talent gaps, you’ll have a team that is adaptive, inclusive, creative and able to overcome any problem that comes its way. 

At Deeper Signals, we are pioneering new approaches that enable smart firms and managers to square the circle: identify the qualities of high performance and talent, but also warn of conformity and not enough cognitive diversity in the talent pool. These insights help leaders build teams that are fit for purpose and future ready.

Leadership is always about tradeoffs. Time to trade-in old approaches for new. 

All posts

Hire for diversity, not performance

Author
Dave Winsborough
Created on
May 5, 2025

You've built a team of exceptional workers, who do a great job of delivering their outputs. You have nurtured this group carefully over a couple of years, using talent assessments to match employee profiles to that of high performers. Given this, the group is a lot the same — kind of quirky, introverted, naive, a bit obsessive and they love routine, but work quality is high and productivity good.

And then a pandemic hits.  

Suddenly this group’s routines, important rituals and processes are completely disrupted. Now they all want your attention individually, and they seem lost and unable to cope with the back-to-back Zoom calls, working from home and changed systems. Never mind quality, getting anything done seems impossible.

Organizational change drastically confounds the traditional ways we go about hiring and developing employee talent. Traditional ways of using talent assessments for hiring are overtly biased: they filter out some people because their characteristics don't fit a pre-defined high performer profile, and select people who are all similar. 

Psychologists have pushed this technique because it works well. But only if the job requirements remain constant and the world doesn't change. The need for diversity and variability in talent that can respond to change is often overlooked, and in its place, predictability and conformity are (well-intentionally) sought after. 

If it wasn’t already obvious, 2020 showed us that our teams and organizations need to have flexible, diverse and adaptive talent as all industries are not magically insulated from real world events.

Rather than cultivating employee talent that is tightly mapped against a “cookie-cutter” set of high-performance competencies, smart firms and leaders seek greater variability in their hires  — even if that costs a little bit of performance. Resilience, creativity, and adaptability beat high performing clones every single time there is a change or a disruption to 'normal'.

Human history is replete with examples of teams that went on to succeed and achieve ambitious goals, not because they all conformed to traditional notions of talent (i.e. experience, technical expertise and intelligence), but because they had a diverse set of complementary characteristics and understood how to work together, or what we call Cognitive Diversity.

 If you are looking to hire talent into your team, we ask you to consider the performance-diversity trade-off:

  • If you hire for traditional notions of performance, you will have a team that is well-positioned to work and execute goals in a specific and consistent way but struggle with agility and flexibility.
  • If you hire for diversity and plan to complement and close existing talent gaps, you’ll have a team that is adaptive, inclusive, creative and able to overcome any problem that comes its way. 

At Deeper Signals, we are pioneering new approaches that enable smart firms and managers to square the circle: identify the qualities of high performance and talent, but also warn of conformity and not enough cognitive diversity in the talent pool. These insights help leaders build teams that are fit for purpose and future ready.

Leadership is always about tradeoffs. Time to trade-in old approaches for new. 

All posts

Hire for diversity, not performance

Customer
Job Title

You've built a team of exceptional workers, who do a great job of delivering their outputs. You have nurtured this group carefully over a couple of years, using talent assessments to match employee profiles to that of high performers. Given this, the group is a lot the same — kind of quirky, introverted, naive, a bit obsessive and they love routine, but work quality is high and productivity good.

And then a pandemic hits.  

Suddenly this group’s routines, important rituals and processes are completely disrupted. Now they all want your attention individually, and they seem lost and unable to cope with the back-to-back Zoom calls, working from home and changed systems. Never mind quality, getting anything done seems impossible.

Organizational change drastically confounds the traditional ways we go about hiring and developing employee talent. Traditional ways of using talent assessments for hiring are overtly biased: they filter out some people because their characteristics don't fit a pre-defined high performer profile, and select people who are all similar. 

Psychologists have pushed this technique because it works well. But only if the job requirements remain constant and the world doesn't change. The need for diversity and variability in talent that can respond to change is often overlooked, and in its place, predictability and conformity are (well-intentionally) sought after. 

If it wasn’t already obvious, 2020 showed us that our teams and organizations need to have flexible, diverse and adaptive talent as all industries are not magically insulated from real world events.

Rather than cultivating employee talent that is tightly mapped against a “cookie-cutter” set of high-performance competencies, smart firms and leaders seek greater variability in their hires  — even if that costs a little bit of performance. Resilience, creativity, and adaptability beat high performing clones every single time there is a change or a disruption to 'normal'.

Human history is replete with examples of teams that went on to succeed and achieve ambitious goals, not because they all conformed to traditional notions of talent (i.e. experience, technical expertise and intelligence), but because they had a diverse set of complementary characteristics and understood how to work together, or what we call Cognitive Diversity.

 If you are looking to hire talent into your team, we ask you to consider the performance-diversity trade-off:

  • If you hire for traditional notions of performance, you will have a team that is well-positioned to work and execute goals in a specific and consistent way but struggle with agility and flexibility.
  • If you hire for diversity and plan to complement and close existing talent gaps, you’ll have a team that is adaptive, inclusive, creative and able to overcome any problem that comes its way. 

At Deeper Signals, we are pioneering new approaches that enable smart firms and managers to square the circle: identify the qualities of high performance and talent, but also warn of conformity and not enough cognitive diversity in the talent pool. These insights help leaders build teams that are fit for purpose and future ready.

Leadership is always about tradeoffs. Time to trade-in old approaches for new. 

Ready for your Spotlight?
Contact us to book your Customer Spotlight and showcase your work to an extensive, global audience!
Start your free trial today
Free access to Deeper Signals’ quick, scientific assessments, feedback tools, and more.
Start Free Trial
Recent posts
Articles
What Does Your Hiring Process Signal to Candidates?
A hiring process is a two-way evaluation. While you read candidates, they're reading you. Here is what the research says about designing hiring that wins the candidates you actually want.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Turn Executive Assessment Data into a Leadership Narrative with an AI Skill
Psychometrics, 360s, interviews, references — this free Deeper Signals skill codes it all against a role's success criteria into an auditable leadership narrative.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Review an Assessment's Evidence Base with an AI Skill
How well is that assessment actually evidenced? This free Deeper Signals AI skill maps any instrument against the APA, SIOP, EFPA, and ITC standards.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Create a Coaching Plan from Assessment Results in Under 10 Minutes
Learn how Deeper Signals' free Development Plan skill turns assessment results into a coach-ready plan in under 10 minutes.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Build a Finance-Ready Business Case with the Assessment ROI Calculator
See how Deeper Signals' free Assessment ROI Calculator turns a few workforce data points into a finance-ready business case for assessment investment.
Read more
Want more articles like this?
Subscribe to our newsletter
Practical insights on people and performance, delivered to your inbox
Subscribe
Recent posts
Articles
What Does Your Hiring Process Signal to Candidates?
A hiring process is a two-way evaluation. While you read candidates, they're reading you. Here is what the research says about designing hiring that wins the candidates you actually want.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Turn Executive Assessment Data into a Leadership Narrative with an AI Skill
Psychometrics, 360s, interviews, references — this free Deeper Signals skill codes it all against a role's success criteria into an auditable leadership narrative.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Review an Assessment's Evidence Base with an AI Skill
How well is that assessment actually evidenced? This free Deeper Signals AI skill maps any instrument against the APA, SIOP, EFPA, and ITC standards.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Create a Coaching Plan from Assessment Results in Under 10 Minutes
Learn how Deeper Signals' free Development Plan skill turns assessment results into a coach-ready plan in under 10 minutes.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to Build a Finance-Ready Business Case with the Assessment ROI Calculator
See how Deeper Signals' free Assessment ROI Calculator turns a few workforce data points into a finance-ready business case for assessment investment.
Read more
Curious to learn more?

Schedule a call with Deeper Signals to understand how our assessments and feedback tools help people gain a deep awareness of their talents and reach their full potential. Underpinned by science and technology, we build talented people, leaders and companies.

  • Scalable and engaging assessment solutions
  • Measurable and predictive talent insights
  • Powered by technology and science that drives results
Let's talk!
  • Scalable interventions for growth
  • Measurable data, insights and outcomes for high performance
  • Proven scientific expertise that links results to outcomes
Thank you!
Would you like to schedule a meeting?
Please fill all fields before submitting the form.