All posts
The New Science of Extreme Behavior
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
March 18, 2024

The first article in this three-part series explored the importance of self-awareness and the critical role it plays in managing our extreme tendencies. Here we take a deeper dive into the science of extremes and outline the latest scientific thinking  used to understand these dispositions. 

Conventional thinking. 

There is growing interest today amongst talent management practitioners and consultants in understanding the dark side of their leaders. Overconfident, narcissistic and erratic leadership styles produce toxic environments and can derail organizations. When attempting to understand  these tendencies in an individual, two frameworks are conventionally used: The Dark Triad  and a non-clinical application of DSM-IV personality disorders. These models define extreme traits in a categorical manner with qualitatively distinct dimensions. 

While these frameworks have become the “go to” tools for understanding one’s dark side behaviors, they have limitations in understanding the full array of risky behaviors that manifest in the workplace. The latest thinking in personality science suggests a new approach, one that moves away from clinical and categorical dispositions, to a model that views our extreme behaviors to be an extension and exaggeration of our normal personality. 

Considering personality when defining extreme behavior.

The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is widely regarded to be one of the most robust and empirical frameworks of personality. FFM identifies five personality dimensions comprising conscientiousness, emotional stability, agreeableness and openness to experience. FFM dimensions are not categorical in nature (i.e., either you possess it or you don’t), rather individuals are considered to exhibit varying degrees of these behaviors on a continuum from extremely low to extremely high. Psychologists have generally regarded possessing a greater extent of these traits to be better. However, there is a growing body of research that suggests that at an extreme, that is demonstrating too much or too little of these characteristics, could have negative outcomes. 

For example, conscientiousness, which is typically considered a desirable personality trait, could appear undesirable at its extremes. Extremely high scorers could be inflexible and extremely low scorers, undependable. Moreover, contrary to what one is inclined to believe, in sales, individuals who score average on extraversion tend to perform better than those at the extremes. Aristotle made this argument thousands of years ago when he noted that all human qualities can become dysfunctional if they are too extreme.

This then raises the question of whether extreme behavior could be defined as part of a continuum of one’s personality, rather than separate categories of behavior?

Reframing extreme behavior as an extension of personality.

There is growing evidence that suggests that psychopathology is not limited to people who exhibit extreme behaviors alone. Clinical psychiatry is changing its approach in defining dysfunctional personality disorders, due to the poor reliability of previously determined diagnostic categories. The FFM now forms the backbone of the latest approach set by the American Psychiatric Association. Behavioral dispositions which fall at the extremes of the FFM are now considered likely to be dysfunctional, maladaptive, and a strain on interpersonal relationships, while personalities that lie in the middle are more likely to be adaptive and functional.

In practice this means that our extreme tendencies are not wholly different from our day-to-day dispositions or personality. Instead, when we drop our guard or feel stressed, these otherwise helpful characteristics become exaggerated. The same way overusing a muscle causes strain and injury, operating at the extreme of one’s normal self leads to negative outcomes. 

The Deeper Signals approach.

At Deeper Signals, our talent assessments are built on this latest scientific thinking and empirical research. The Core Drivers framework that forms the foundation of our tools is built on this modern, dimensional way of assessing one’s extreme dispositions. Taking an integrated approach to interpreting  an individual’s normal and extreme tendencies, provides a holistic understanding of one’s strengths and challenges. 

In addition to accurate insights of an individual’s talents and extremes, our tools provide actionable feedback to raise self-awareness and support behavioral change. Moreover all of this information is provided  in a single report, that is easy to understand,  without the need to understand additional frameworks with interpretative conflicts. Our goal is to keep things easy and intuitive, helping us achieve our mission of providing self-insight and awareness to all. 

Although it can be uncomfortable to address our extremes and the prickly aspects of our behavior, if we’re serious about growing talent, building and becoming  effective leaders, we must take an honest look at the good, the bad and the ugly!

Stay tuned for our third and final entry in this series, where we will share a deep dive into the 12 “Core Risks” and how to manage them.

Recent posts
Guides & Tips
5 Effective Strategies to Navigate Team Conflict
Explore the power of effective conflict management strategies, from fostering open communication to embracing diversity and emotional intelligence. Learn how addressing conflict at its root can create a culture of trust, respect, and innovation.
Read more
Guides & Tips
8 key facts about Cognitive Diversity
With the help of our new blog, discover how embracing diverse perspectives enhances problem-solving, fosters innovation, and boosts employee engagement. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to use assessments throughout the whole talent journey
Talent assessments, now a $7 billion industry, are crucial throughout the talent lifecycle. They help in recruiting the right fit, easing onboarding, fostering development, and identifying future leaders. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Technology
Meet Your AI Team Coach, Scientifically Designed to Transform Your Teams
We are thrilled to unveil our generative AI Team Coach, offering leaders dynamic, step-by-step coaching strategies tailored to their team’s unique personality, challenges, and goals.
Read more
News & Press
Enhance Hiring and Development with Deeper Signals' New Assessment Experience
Deeper Signals is thrilled to announce a new milestone with an elevated user-friendly, efficient assessment experience! The latest enhancements offer modern, scientific assessments that streamline hiring, accelerate onboarding, and personalize development journeys.
Read more
All posts
The New Science of Extreme Behavior
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
March 18, 2024

The first article in this three-part series explored the importance of self-awareness and the critical role it plays in managing our extreme tendencies. Here we take a deeper dive into the science of extremes and outline the latest scientific thinking  used to understand these dispositions. 

Conventional thinking. 

There is growing interest today amongst talent management practitioners and consultants in understanding the dark side of their leaders. Overconfident, narcissistic and erratic leadership styles produce toxic environments and can derail organizations. When attempting to understand  these tendencies in an individual, two frameworks are conventionally used: The Dark Triad  and a non-clinical application of DSM-IV personality disorders. These models define extreme traits in a categorical manner with qualitatively distinct dimensions. 

While these frameworks have become the “go to” tools for understanding one’s dark side behaviors, they have limitations in understanding the full array of risky behaviors that manifest in the workplace. The latest thinking in personality science suggests a new approach, one that moves away from clinical and categorical dispositions, to a model that views our extreme behaviors to be an extension and exaggeration of our normal personality. 

Considering personality when defining extreme behavior.

The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is widely regarded to be one of the most robust and empirical frameworks of personality. FFM identifies five personality dimensions comprising conscientiousness, emotional stability, agreeableness and openness to experience. FFM dimensions are not categorical in nature (i.e., either you possess it or you don’t), rather individuals are considered to exhibit varying degrees of these behaviors on a continuum from extremely low to extremely high. Psychologists have generally regarded possessing a greater extent of these traits to be better. However, there is a growing body of research that suggests that at an extreme, that is demonstrating too much or too little of these characteristics, could have negative outcomes. 

For example, conscientiousness, which is typically considered a desirable personality trait, could appear undesirable at its extremes. Extremely high scorers could be inflexible and extremely low scorers, undependable. Moreover, contrary to what one is inclined to believe, in sales, individuals who score average on extraversion tend to perform better than those at the extremes. Aristotle made this argument thousands of years ago when he noted that all human qualities can become dysfunctional if they are too extreme.

This then raises the question of whether extreme behavior could be defined as part of a continuum of one’s personality, rather than separate categories of behavior?

Reframing extreme behavior as an extension of personality.

There is growing evidence that suggests that psychopathology is not limited to people who exhibit extreme behaviors alone. Clinical psychiatry is changing its approach in defining dysfunctional personality disorders, due to the poor reliability of previously determined diagnostic categories. The FFM now forms the backbone of the latest approach set by the American Psychiatric Association. Behavioral dispositions which fall at the extremes of the FFM are now considered likely to be dysfunctional, maladaptive, and a strain on interpersonal relationships, while personalities that lie in the middle are more likely to be adaptive and functional.

In practice this means that our extreme tendencies are not wholly different from our day-to-day dispositions or personality. Instead, when we drop our guard or feel stressed, these otherwise helpful characteristics become exaggerated. The same way overusing a muscle causes strain and injury, operating at the extreme of one’s normal self leads to negative outcomes. 

The Deeper Signals approach.

At Deeper Signals, our talent assessments are built on this latest scientific thinking and empirical research. The Core Drivers framework that forms the foundation of our tools is built on this modern, dimensional way of assessing one’s extreme dispositions. Taking an integrated approach to interpreting  an individual’s normal and extreme tendencies, provides a holistic understanding of one’s strengths and challenges. 

In addition to accurate insights of an individual’s talents and extremes, our tools provide actionable feedback to raise self-awareness and support behavioral change. Moreover all of this information is provided  in a single report, that is easy to understand,  without the need to understand additional frameworks with interpretative conflicts. Our goal is to keep things easy and intuitive, helping us achieve our mission of providing self-insight and awareness to all. 

Although it can be uncomfortable to address our extremes and the prickly aspects of our behavior, if we’re serious about growing talent, building and becoming  effective leaders, we must take an honest look at the good, the bad and the ugly!

Stay tuned for our third and final entry in this series, where we will share a deep dive into the 12 “Core Risks” and how to manage them.

Recent posts
Guides & Tips
5 Effective Strategies to Navigate Team Conflict
Explore the power of effective conflict management strategies, from fostering open communication to embracing diversity and emotional intelligence. Learn how addressing conflict at its root can create a culture of trust, respect, and innovation.
Read more
Guides & Tips
8 key facts about Cognitive Diversity
With the help of our new blog, discover how embracing diverse perspectives enhances problem-solving, fosters innovation, and boosts employee engagement. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to use assessments throughout the whole talent journey
Talent assessments, now a $7 billion industry, are crucial throughout the talent lifecycle. They help in recruiting the right fit, easing onboarding, fostering development, and identifying future leaders. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Technology
Meet Your AI Team Coach, Scientifically Designed to Transform Your Teams
We are thrilled to unveil our generative AI Team Coach, offering leaders dynamic, step-by-step coaching strategies tailored to their team’s unique personality, challenges, and goals.
Read more
News & Press
Enhance Hiring and Development with Deeper Signals' New Assessment Experience
Deeper Signals is thrilled to announce a new milestone with an elevated user-friendly, efficient assessment experience! The latest enhancements offer modern, scientific assessments that streamline hiring, accelerate onboarding, and personalize development journeys.
Read more
All posts
The New Science of Extreme Behavior
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
March 18, 2024

The first article in this three-part series explored the importance of self-awareness and the critical role it plays in managing our extreme tendencies. Here we take a deeper dive into the science of extremes and outline the latest scientific thinking  used to understand these dispositions. 

Conventional thinking. 

There is growing interest today amongst talent management practitioners and consultants in understanding the dark side of their leaders. Overconfident, narcissistic and erratic leadership styles produce toxic environments and can derail organizations. When attempting to understand  these tendencies in an individual, two frameworks are conventionally used: The Dark Triad  and a non-clinical application of DSM-IV personality disorders. These models define extreme traits in a categorical manner with qualitatively distinct dimensions. 

While these frameworks have become the “go to” tools for understanding one’s dark side behaviors, they have limitations in understanding the full array of risky behaviors that manifest in the workplace. The latest thinking in personality science suggests a new approach, one that moves away from clinical and categorical dispositions, to a model that views our extreme behaviors to be an extension and exaggeration of our normal personality. 

Considering personality when defining extreme behavior.

The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is widely regarded to be one of the most robust and empirical frameworks of personality. FFM identifies five personality dimensions comprising conscientiousness, emotional stability, agreeableness and openness to experience. FFM dimensions are not categorical in nature (i.e., either you possess it or you don’t), rather individuals are considered to exhibit varying degrees of these behaviors on a continuum from extremely low to extremely high. Psychologists have generally regarded possessing a greater extent of these traits to be better. However, there is a growing body of research that suggests that at an extreme, that is demonstrating too much or too little of these characteristics, could have negative outcomes. 

For example, conscientiousness, which is typically considered a desirable personality trait, could appear undesirable at its extremes. Extremely high scorers could be inflexible and extremely low scorers, undependable. Moreover, contrary to what one is inclined to believe, in sales, individuals who score average on extraversion tend to perform better than those at the extremes. Aristotle made this argument thousands of years ago when he noted that all human qualities can become dysfunctional if they are too extreme.

This then raises the question of whether extreme behavior could be defined as part of a continuum of one’s personality, rather than separate categories of behavior?

Reframing extreme behavior as an extension of personality.

There is growing evidence that suggests that psychopathology is not limited to people who exhibit extreme behaviors alone. Clinical psychiatry is changing its approach in defining dysfunctional personality disorders, due to the poor reliability of previously determined diagnostic categories. The FFM now forms the backbone of the latest approach set by the American Psychiatric Association. Behavioral dispositions which fall at the extremes of the FFM are now considered likely to be dysfunctional, maladaptive, and a strain on interpersonal relationships, while personalities that lie in the middle are more likely to be adaptive and functional.

In practice this means that our extreme tendencies are not wholly different from our day-to-day dispositions or personality. Instead, when we drop our guard or feel stressed, these otherwise helpful characteristics become exaggerated. The same way overusing a muscle causes strain and injury, operating at the extreme of one’s normal self leads to negative outcomes. 

The Deeper Signals approach.

At Deeper Signals, our talent assessments are built on this latest scientific thinking and empirical research. The Core Drivers framework that forms the foundation of our tools is built on this modern, dimensional way of assessing one’s extreme dispositions. Taking an integrated approach to interpreting  an individual’s normal and extreme tendencies, provides a holistic understanding of one’s strengths and challenges. 

In addition to accurate insights of an individual’s talents and extremes, our tools provide actionable feedback to raise self-awareness and support behavioral change. Moreover all of this information is provided  in a single report, that is easy to understand,  without the need to understand additional frameworks with interpretative conflicts. Our goal is to keep things easy and intuitive, helping us achieve our mission of providing self-insight and awareness to all. 

Although it can be uncomfortable to address our extremes and the prickly aspects of our behavior, if we’re serious about growing talent, building and becoming  effective leaders, we must take an honest look at the good, the bad and the ugly!

Stay tuned for our third and final entry in this series, where we will share a deep dive into the 12 “Core Risks” and how to manage them.

Recent posts
Guides & Tips
5 Effective Strategies to Navigate Team Conflict
Explore the power of effective conflict management strategies, from fostering open communication to embracing diversity and emotional intelligence. Learn how addressing conflict at its root can create a culture of trust, respect, and innovation.
Read more
Guides & Tips
8 key facts about Cognitive Diversity
With the help of our new blog, discover how embracing diverse perspectives enhances problem-solving, fosters innovation, and boosts employee engagement. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to use assessments throughout the whole talent journey
Talent assessments, now a $7 billion industry, are crucial throughout the talent lifecycle. They help in recruiting the right fit, easing onboarding, fostering development, and identifying future leaders. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Technology
Meet Your AI Team Coach, Scientifically Designed to Transform Your Teams
We are thrilled to unveil our generative AI Team Coach, offering leaders dynamic, step-by-step coaching strategies tailored to their team’s unique personality, challenges, and goals.
Read more
News & Press
Enhance Hiring and Development with Deeper Signals' New Assessment Experience
Deeper Signals is thrilled to announce a new milestone with an elevated user-friendly, efficient assessment experience! The latest enhancements offer modern, scientific assessments that streamline hiring, accelerate onboarding, and personalize development journeys.
Read more
All posts
The New Science of Extreme Behavior
Customer
Job Title

The first article in this three-part series explored the importance of self-awareness and the critical role it plays in managing our extreme tendencies. Here we take a deeper dive into the science of extremes and outline the latest scientific thinking  used to understand these dispositions. 

Conventional thinking. 

There is growing interest today amongst talent management practitioners and consultants in understanding the dark side of their leaders. Overconfident, narcissistic and erratic leadership styles produce toxic environments and can derail organizations. When attempting to understand  these tendencies in an individual, two frameworks are conventionally used: The Dark Triad  and a non-clinical application of DSM-IV personality disorders. These models define extreme traits in a categorical manner with qualitatively distinct dimensions. 

While these frameworks have become the “go to” tools for understanding one’s dark side behaviors, they have limitations in understanding the full array of risky behaviors that manifest in the workplace. The latest thinking in personality science suggests a new approach, one that moves away from clinical and categorical dispositions, to a model that views our extreme behaviors to be an extension and exaggeration of our normal personality. 

Considering personality when defining extreme behavior.

The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is widely regarded to be one of the most robust and empirical frameworks of personality. FFM identifies five personality dimensions comprising conscientiousness, emotional stability, agreeableness and openness to experience. FFM dimensions are not categorical in nature (i.e., either you possess it or you don’t), rather individuals are considered to exhibit varying degrees of these behaviors on a continuum from extremely low to extremely high. Psychologists have generally regarded possessing a greater extent of these traits to be better. However, there is a growing body of research that suggests that at an extreme, that is demonstrating too much or too little of these characteristics, could have negative outcomes. 

For example, conscientiousness, which is typically considered a desirable personality trait, could appear undesirable at its extremes. Extremely high scorers could be inflexible and extremely low scorers, undependable. Moreover, contrary to what one is inclined to believe, in sales, individuals who score average on extraversion tend to perform better than those at the extremes. Aristotle made this argument thousands of years ago when he noted that all human qualities can become dysfunctional if they are too extreme.

This then raises the question of whether extreme behavior could be defined as part of a continuum of one’s personality, rather than separate categories of behavior?

Reframing extreme behavior as an extension of personality.

There is growing evidence that suggests that psychopathology is not limited to people who exhibit extreme behaviors alone. Clinical psychiatry is changing its approach in defining dysfunctional personality disorders, due to the poor reliability of previously determined diagnostic categories. The FFM now forms the backbone of the latest approach set by the American Psychiatric Association. Behavioral dispositions which fall at the extremes of the FFM are now considered likely to be dysfunctional, maladaptive, and a strain on interpersonal relationships, while personalities that lie in the middle are more likely to be adaptive and functional.

In practice this means that our extreme tendencies are not wholly different from our day-to-day dispositions or personality. Instead, when we drop our guard or feel stressed, these otherwise helpful characteristics become exaggerated. The same way overusing a muscle causes strain and injury, operating at the extreme of one’s normal self leads to negative outcomes. 

The Deeper Signals approach.

At Deeper Signals, our talent assessments are built on this latest scientific thinking and empirical research. The Core Drivers framework that forms the foundation of our tools is built on this modern, dimensional way of assessing one’s extreme dispositions. Taking an integrated approach to interpreting  an individual’s normal and extreme tendencies, provides a holistic understanding of one’s strengths and challenges. 

In addition to accurate insights of an individual’s talents and extremes, our tools provide actionable feedback to raise self-awareness and support behavioral change. Moreover all of this information is provided  in a single report, that is easy to understand,  without the need to understand additional frameworks with interpretative conflicts. Our goal is to keep things easy and intuitive, helping us achieve our mission of providing self-insight and awareness to all. 

Although it can be uncomfortable to address our extremes and the prickly aspects of our behavior, if we’re serious about growing talent, building and becoming  effective leaders, we must take an honest look at the good, the bad and the ugly!

Stay tuned for our third and final entry in this series, where we will share a deep dive into the 12 “Core Risks” and how to manage them.

Ready for your Spotlight?
Contact us to book your Customer Spotlight and showcase your work to an extensive, global audience!
Start your free trial today
Free access to Deeper Signals’ quick, scientific assessments, feedback tools, and more.
Start Free Trial
Recent posts
Guides & Tips
5 Effective Strategies to Navigate Team Conflict
Explore the power of effective conflict management strategies, from fostering open communication to embracing diversity and emotional intelligence. Learn how addressing conflict at its root can create a culture of trust, respect, and innovation.
Read more
Guides & Tips
8 key facts about Cognitive Diversity
With the help of our new blog, discover how embracing diverse perspectives enhances problem-solving, fosters innovation, and boosts employee engagement. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Guides & Tips
How to use assessments throughout the whole talent journey
Talent assessments, now a $7 billion industry, are crucial throughout the talent lifecycle. They help in recruiting the right fit, easing onboarding, fostering development, and identifying future leaders. Read our blog to know more.
Read more
Technology
Meet Your AI Team Coach, Scientifically Designed to Transform Your Teams
We are thrilled to unveil our generative AI Team Coach, offering leaders dynamic, step-by-step coaching strategies tailored to their team’s unique personality, challenges, and goals.
Read more
News & Press
Enhance Hiring and Development with Deeper Signals' New Assessment Experience
Deeper Signals is thrilled to announce a new milestone with an elevated user-friendly, efficient assessment experience! The latest enhancements offer modern, scientific assessments that streamline hiring, accelerate onboarding, and personalize development journeys.
Read more
Curious to learn more?

Schedule a call with Deeper Signals to understand how our assessments and feedback tools help people gain a deep awareness of their talents and reach their full potential. Underpinned by science and technology, we build talented people, leaders and companies.

  • Scalable and engaging assessment solutions
  • Measurable and predictive talent insights
  • Powered by technology and science that drives results
Let's talk!
  • Scalable interventions for growth
  • Measureable data, insights and outcomes for high performance
  • Proven scientific expertise that links results to outcomes
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Please fill all fields before submiting the form.
Sign up
Want to be the first to know?
Thank you, we will be in touch soon!‍
Please fill all fields before submiting the form.